I had a chat with kingfisher (Bryan) regarding posting some articles on here that I've written purely for recreational purposes. He's encouraged me to post them on here as I'm looking to pursue a career in journalism post University. Would appreciate you taking the time to read whatever I write/post in this. And would love some feedback on anything that I write.
Ideally I'd like feedback on my writing skills, but I'd also like the point of view and premise of the argument criticised too. I don't care how critical it is, I'm thick skinned I can take whatever you've got to say. At this stage everything is valuable as I try and build a portfolio of work and enhance my skills.
The link should appear below, just click on it and it will take you to the article and my WordPress site. Feel free to read anything else that is on that site.
i read the beginning of your article but ended after reading the words Juxtaposed, Maladroit and Egalitarian
because i found myself lost in your intellect
football is a simple game for simple people like myself some of us dont know those kind of words and its meant to be a simple match report and i just got lost and didnt want to come across anymore foolish than i already know i am
Hi jrperry1882 and a big welcome to the Hoops and Dreams site.
I thought your piece contained good accurate, factual information whilst also relaying some some good opinion.
Not that I'm an expert but Tomcat 75 makes a good point about some of the words you are using. A lot has to do with who the article is being pitched at and I dont think Ive ever used the words, Juxtaposed, Maladroit or Egalitarian. My level is the Daily Mail and the Sun but that probably says more about the simple sole that I am.
Just my opinion but whilst the use of powerful and emotive language is good it's more about catching the readers’ attention so that they are encouraged to read on.
Hopefully, you write some pieces and get them published. Please continue to post on here because your views and opinions are very welcome.
Hi jrperry1882 and a big welcome to the Hoops and Dreams site.
I thought your piece contained good accurate, factual information whilst also relaying some some good opinion.
Not that I'm an expert but Tomcat 75 makes a good point about some of the words you are using. A lot has to do with who the article is being pitched at and I dont think Ive ever used the words, Juxtaposed, Maladroit or Egalitarian. My level is the Daily Mail and the Sun but that probably says more about the simple sole that I am.
Just my opinion but whilst the use of powerful and emotive language is good it's more about catching the readers’ attention so that they are encouraged to read on.
Hopefully, you write some pieces and get them published. Please continue to post on here because your views and opinions are very welcome.
Let me first say I appreciate you joining and sharing your article.
Now onto the analysis. No doubting it is a very well written and articulate piece. Reminds me of something you'd read in The Telegraph.
However, it sometimes feels a bit too "wordy" just for the sake of it...an analogy too far perhaps.
I liked this line with a nice sporting analogy *although I think it should have said we are glued to their wheels rather than the other way around as we are doing the chasing*:
Each vehicle remains insight, with Bournemouth and Blackburn glued to our wheels as we enter the next chicane. Both offer reasons for us to feel encouraged at the prospect of overtaking them.
However, this one in the same paragraph felt one too far.
Meanwhile, the latter, who remain over-reliant upon Ben Brereton Díaz, are only fractionally ahead, despite staying out on the track as everybody else pitted behind the safety car.
The first one makes sense - we are right behind and trying to get past.
The second one I'm not even sure what the analogy is trying to say? 'Everybody else pitted'....does this mean we made signings and they didn't?
That last bit could easily have just said "The latter, fractionally ahead, remain overly-reliant on Ben Brereton-Diaz". Done. That's 11 words instead of 29 and is easier to read and says the same thing! It's nice to have an analogy every now and again, but this just goes too far.
I know you are trying to have the F1 theme throughout, which I like, but it always needs to stay relevant and it just goes a bit too far for me.
I really like this paragraph and what you are trying to do:
During the earlier stages of the season, Middlesbrough, Sheffield United, and particularly Nottingham Forest each looked consigned to irrelevance, part of the glut of drivers stuck towards the back of the grid. Upheld by traffic or undermined altogether by mechanical failings, each appeared in danger of retiring from the race. But since pitting, they have all looked reinvigorated. Refuelled by new managers and boosted by new additions replacing faulty parts, each now drives upon a fresher set of tires that have enabled them to surpass previous pacesetters whose engines have stalled.
BUT it still feels like as much analogy as football analysis. It's meant to be a football article but the analogy just goes a tad too far. You could argue 2/3 of that paragraph have little to do with football. You can keep the F1 slant throughout the whole piece but just strip it back slightly.
It could easily be this and it still has your F1 slant
During the earlier stages of the season, Middlesbrough, Sheffield United, and particularly Nottingham Forest were stuck toward the back of the grid and in danger of retiring from the race. But fuelled by new managers and reinvigorated by new additions each has found an extra gear...
It just needs to be a bit more pithy at times.
Another good example is this:
However, it is perhaps too early to detect such tectonic shifts within the promotion setup. After all, a third of the season remains, as does another international break which could easily precipitate a further fundamental realignment. But the rise of outsiders does suggest some form of movement is occurring. At the very least, it implies that the race to the finish has finally commenced. Previously teams had not appeared in direct competition with one another. Everybody seemed more content to pass each lap at a consistent pace and escape unscathed, almost as if the first two-thirds of the season were qualifying periods for the eventual 16 lap sprint.
I genuinely think the bit I've underlined could go. The paragraph is actually better ending with the "race to finish has finally commenced". That analogy is subtle. The rest is OTT.
Lastly, I don't think the title works. Given the F1 theme shouldn't the title tie in with? And maybe also hint at football? I don't think "Time to hold with the hare and hunt with the hounds" gives any indication of what is to come. I'm not suggesting it should be this but "The race for the flag" would be more suitable given the article to come as a quick example.
Overall I do like the F1 analogy running through, I like how you end with the champagne, it's a good angle. But be wary of overkill because readers will switch off their engines. Sorry. I'll get my coat.
Last Edit: Feb 13, 2022 7:10:06 GMT by northwesthoop
Cheers gents, appreciate that feedback. Accept and agree with pretty everything you have all said.
Regarding the ‘not pitting’ analogy with Blackburn, it’s a nod to them being games ahead - everyone else ‘pitted’ during COVID problems, Blackburn stayed on the track.
But thanks again for everything, appreciate you all taking the time out to read it and give it some critique. As I said earlier, it’s all valuable and part of the process of polishing myself as a writer.
I would say audience wise, if I was writing, I would target broadsheets, but going forward I’ll tone it down a bit so to keep everyone on here engaged and just to keep myself experimenting
Shame about the result Saturday
Last Edit: Feb 13, 2022 13:51:48 GMT by jrperry1882