I went with Thomas, thought his movement was good all game and could have picked out a bit quicker by the midfield. Also thought Moses and Field played well
Thomas was doing everything to try and take his opportunity. He did well and was a 7 in the first half. He did fade and got tired but I like his energy and commitment.
@tomcat75 I am puzzled how WLS can award Dickie & Barbet a 6, saying they did their best, and then say Sanderson was very poor and award him a '5'? I think it was between Field and Thomas and, as he kept at it all 90 mins it edged Field's way for me.
i havent seen any of the game nor do i wish to ive avoided 18 texts from every Fulham fan i know LOL
I was not expecting you to know their logic! When you see the full 90 mins video (rather than just the highlights) I think you will see a QPR side that worked to stifle Fulham and take the game to them, but lack of quality in some areas mattered. No real shame as on a good day against a below par Fulham we could have been the winners...
I see that Sofa Score had Barbet as our most effective player whilst Wallace and Thomas were our least effect.
Their figures for George Thomas, showed he only completed 76% of his passes and lost possession on 13 occasions which is a concerning figure considering that he only registered 33 touches.