did the board make the right decision in not keeping MW

Prior to the club appointing Warburton the owners announced that the clubs policy was to adopt the Brentford method of signing young untapped talent and developing them with a view to selling them on.

To then appoint the man who couldn't work with that system at Brentford made no sense and was more mismanagement by our owners. Let's not forget that the Brentford method was based on a Head Coach as opposed to a manager.

If the reports are true suggesting we are now going back to the original policy and a Head Coach as opposed to a manager then effectively we have wasted 3 years. I'm not suggesting Warburton was a poor manager but rather that the board continues to mismanage.